From: Luke Lonergan <llonergan@greenplum.com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: Rajesh Kumar Mallah <mallah.rajesh@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 20:49:56 -0700
Message-ID: <C2824274.31AF7%llonergan@greenplum.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070530033152.GV7531@tamriel.snowman.net>
Stephen,
On 5/29/07 8:31 PM, "Stephen Frost" <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> It's just more copies of the same data if it's really a RAID1, for the
> extra, extra paranoid. Basically, in the example above, I'd read it as
> "D1, D2, D5 have identical data on them".
In that case, I'd say it's a waste of disk to add 1+2 redundancy to the
mirrors.
- Luke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: llonergan@greenplum.com, sfrost@snowman.net, mallah.rajesh@gmail.com
Subject: Re: setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives
In-Reply-To: <C2824274.31AF7%llonergan@greenplum.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox