pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luke Lonergan <llonergan@greenplum.com>
To: mark@mark.mielke.cc
Cc: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 13:18:09 -0700
Message-ID: <C2832A11.31CA1%llonergan@greenplum.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070530155733.GA18830@mark.mielke.cc>

Mark,

On 5/30/07 8:57 AM, "mark@mark.mielke.cc" <mark@mark.mielke.cc> wrote:

> One part is corruption. Another is ordering and consistency. ZFS represents
> both RAID-style storage *and* journal-style file system. I imagine consistency
> and ordering is handled through journalling.

Yep and versioning, which answers PFC's scenario.

Short answer: ZFS has a very reliable model that uses checksumming and
journaling along with block versioning to implement "self healing".  There
are others that do some similar things with checksumming on the SAN HW and
cooperation with the filesystem.

- Luke





view thread (27+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <C2832A11.31CA1%llonergan@greenplum.com>
Permalink:  ../C2832A11.31CA1%25llonergan@greenplum.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/C2832A11.31CA1%llonergan@greenplum.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: llonergan@greenplum.com, mark@mark.mielke.cc, mstone+postgres@mathom.us
  Subject: Re: setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives
  In-Reply-To: <C2832A11.31CA1%llonergan@greenplum.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox