public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Pavel Stehule <[email protected]>
To: Dmitry Dolgov <[email protected]>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <[email protected]>
Cc: Erik Rijkers <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
Cc: Amit Kapila <[email protected]>
Cc: DUVAL REMI <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: proposal: schema variables
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 19:04:34 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFj8pRBHrwi6M=QtB_DXjh++r6rEf1HPo1fRM0jN2PJ-CyG0YA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ssk7uqvu7rirq4vl4ns7vvr5efvgqwpuonu3qpfl6tem7ypifw@jchzp34fhqje>
References: <CAFj8pRA6nJRg8oq5k_Cdk5oH5_FjtViG8XLmHKrkqOuiMT_CKQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFj8pRBWMLP3Vyr8z+19eaiJKQoVtBfmDhNJFKXDX6uFzd4vBQ@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<CAFj8pRAjU-X6rEE9=1++PdtXOPc2uo=yu-tcFXByi-kN3B_7Vw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFj8pRC+hPCc2X88xC=pTJoqmVPApDsageZOMyqaxi5788WxHA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFj8pRDJ9cq00VYSHxs6LsoHNWjhYXyWWBtV6UgeWwhs0AHa9A@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFj8pRBPXTcw_3fpKtgVthV2+9rZGhxitZ40DnAwCrK601TZZg@mail.gmail.com>
<ndtfl4tsnpkb7m7hwvnmlpsascpgd3a7xvjmjhtxffsbrgygtm@4du6zsmnnwq5>
<CAFj8pRAu4XvNCGu1751t=2YEqLqTjDA3FavMExm2S0KYQq=DdQ@mail.gmail.com>
<ssk7uqvu7rirq4vl4ns7vvr5efvgqwpuonu3qpfl6tem7ypifw@jchzp34fhqje>
ne 10. 11. 2024 v 18:41 odesÃlatel Dmitry Dolgov <[email protected]>
napsal:
> > On Sun, Nov 10, 2024 at 05:19:09PM GMT, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > ne 10. 11. 2024 v 16:24 odesÃlatel Dmitry Dolgov <[email protected]>
> > napsal:
> >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > Thanks for continuing this work. As a side note, I would like to
> mention
> > > how strange the situation in this CF item is. If I understand
> correctly,
> > > there are two hackers threads discussing the same patch, with recent
> > > patches posted in both of them. This is obviously confusing, e.g. the
> > > main concern from another thread, about names clashing, wasn't even
> > > mentioned in this one. Is it possible to reconcile development in one
> > > thread?
> > >
> >
> > This is probably my error. I don't try to organize threads, just I'll try
> > to reply in the thread where I got a question.
>
> It's fine. I just would appreciate some clarity about which patch to
> look at. To confirm, the series in this thread contains everything from
> the other one, plus some improvements, right?
>
I don't remember any change that can be visible for users in this thread.
Laurens does very precious code review (thank you again) - there are bigger
changes in comments, and less changes in code - some parts of code are
moved between patches, some lines were redundant and removed, some lines
were artefacts of some git work and were cleaned. Some redundant tests were
removed. There is no new code.
Regards
Pavel
view thread (439+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: proposal: schema variables
In-Reply-To: <CAFj8pRBHrwi6M=QtB_DXjh++r6rEf1HPo1fRM0jN2PJ-CyG0YA@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox