public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Pavel Stehule <[email protected]>
To: Robert Haas <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: proposal: schema variables
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:49:20 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFj8pRCwTf6kqk8Z+5x8y6F=-S1gP2JTchKnjf2ixf2AMMpahw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+TgmoaZ0iymUS_ZM6LW2yWjabwQs4K8=4GYR1+u-V7ROPz0nA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFj8pRDY+m9OOxfO10R7J0PAkCCauM-TweaTrdsrsLGMb1VbEQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+TgmoaZ0iymUS_ZM6LW2yWjabwQs4K8=4GYR1+u-V7ROPz0nA@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>

2017-11-02 13:35 GMT+01:00 Robert Haas <[email protected]>:

> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Pavel Stehule <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > The variables can be modified by SQL command SET (this is taken from
> > standard, and it natural)
> >
> > SET varname = expression;
>
> Overloading SET to handle both variables and GUCs seems likely to
> create problems, possibly including security problems.  For example,
> maybe a security-definer function could leave behind variables to
> trick the calling code into failing to set GUCs that it intended to
> set.  Or maybe creating a variable at the wrong time will just break
> things randomly.
>

The syntax CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION xxx $$ ... $$ SET GUC=, ... is always
related only to GUC. So there should not be any security risk.

It is another reason why GUC and variables should be separated.

I know so there is risk of possibility of collision. There are two
possibilities

a) use different keyword - but it is out of SQL/PSM and out of another
databases.

b) detect possible collision and raise error when assignment is ambiguous.
I am thinking about similar solution used in plpgsql, where is a
possibility of collision between SQL identifier and plpgsql variable.

Regards

Pavel




>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: proposal: schema variables
  In-Reply-To: <CAFj8pRCwTf6kqk8Z+5x8y6F=-S1gP2JTchKnjf2ixf2AMMpahw@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox