pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ogden <lists@darkstatic.com>
To: Igor Chudov <ichudov@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 13:36:56 -0500
Message-ID: <CD9F56F6-5951-4E60-85E7-519EDF36F43B@darkstatic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMhtkAY2GvGiTz23V10Bev-ibrPWE7GowocT3KeWKm1EoED7WA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMhtkAbK7saRO_Tayb1nS3YLWN=Wns=Ci47qs-3YbX0T2+hkpA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOR=d=0zmw-EGRJyYmwCTxR5g6osbFLS5i-3kzjG05j7S=1JaA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMhtkAah2c4XfSec=OtgL1V51wpD=jygbZnBVBRYCV02MscebQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGTBQpYa+VUXtKZtUDLSosboSMgUEOCd_dkmCPA=4HkjHw2r2g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMhtkAY2GvGiTz23V10Bev-ibrPWE7GowocT3KeWKm1EoED7WA@mail.gmail.com>


On Sep 11, 2011, at 9:21 AM, Igor Chudov wrote:

> 
> 
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Igor Chudov <ichudov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Well, right now, my server has twelve 7,200 RPM 2TB hard drives in a RAID-6
> > configuration.
> > They are managed by a 3WARE 9750 RAID CARD.
> >
> > I would say that I am not very concerned with linear relationship of read
> > speed to disk speed. If that stuff is somewhat slow, it is OK with me.
> 
> With Raid 6 you'll have abysmal performance on write operations.
> In data warehousing, there's lots of writes to temporary files, for
> sorting and stuff like that.
> 
> You should either migrate to raid 10, or set up a separate array for
> temporary files, perhaps raid 0.
> 
> Thanks. I will rebuild the RAID array early next week and I will see if I have a Raid 10 option with that card.
> 
> Quantitatively, what would you say is the write speed difference between RAID 10 and RAID 6?
> 

As someone who migrated a RAID 5 installation to RAID 10, I am getting far better read and write performance on heavy calculation queries. Writing on the RAID 5 really made things crawl. For lots of writing, I think RAID 10 is the best. It should also be noted that I changed my filesystem from ext3 to XFS - this is something you can look into as well. 

Ogden

view thread (48+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <CD9F56F6-5951-4E60-85E7-519EDF36F43B@darkstatic.com>
Permalink:  ../CD9F56F6-5951-4E60-85E7-519EDF36F43B@darkstatic.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/CD9F56F6-5951-4E60-85E7-519EDF36F43B@darkstatic.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: lists@darkstatic.com, ichudov@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB
  In-Reply-To: <CD9F56F6-5951-4E60-85E7-519EDF36F43B@darkstatic.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox