pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mindaugas <ml@kilimas.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Dealing with big tables
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2007 14:35:45 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <E1Iyo2z-00055w-E1@fenris.runbox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r6i5gv06.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com>
References: <E1Iym1h-0004Tg-VQ@garm.runbox.com>
	<87r6i5gv06.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com>


> What exactly is your goal? Do you need this query to respond in under a
> specific limit? What limit? Do you need to be able to execute many instances
> of this query in less than 5s * the number of executions? Or do you have more
> complex queries that you're really worried about?

  I'd like this query to respond under a specific time limit. 5s now is OK but 50s later for 10000 rows is too slow.

> Both Greenplum and EnterpriseDB have products in this space which let you
> break the query up over several servers but at least in EnterpriseDB's case
> it's targeted towards running complex queries which take longer than this to
> run. I doubt you would see much benefit for a 5s query after the overhead of
> sending parts of the query out to different machines and then reassembling the
> results. If your real concern is with more complex queries they may make sense
> though. It's also possible that paying someone to come look at your database
> will find other ways to speed it up.

  I see. This query also should benefit alot even when run in parallel on one server. Since anyway most time it spends in waiting for storage to respond.

  Also off list I was pointed out about covering indexes in MySQL. But they are not supported in PostgreSQL, aren't they?

  Mindaugas



view thread (9+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <E1Iyo2z-00055w-E1@fenris.runbox.com>
Permalink:  ../E1Iyo2z-00055w-E1@fenris.runbox.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/E1Iyo2z-00055w-E1@fenris.runbox.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: ml@kilimas.com
  Subject: Re: Dealing with big tables
  In-Reply-To: <E1Iyo2z-00055w-E1@fenris.runbox.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox