From: Alex Stapleton <alexs@advfn.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: random_page_cost = 1?
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:37:25 +0100
Message-ID: <E272DAB0-E99F-45E2-9461-99E0FD40F2AC@advfn.com> (raw)
Is this advisable? The disks are rather fast (15k iirc) but somehow I
don't think they are covered in whatever magic fairy dust it would
require for a sequential read to be as fast as a random one. However
I could be wrong, are there any circumstances when this is actually
going to help performance?
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: alexs@advfn.com
Subject: Re: random_page_cost = 1?
In-Reply-To: <E272DAB0-E99F-45E2-9461-99E0FD40F2AC@advfn.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox