pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Yen <dba@richyen.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: good effective_io_concurrency for FusionIO drives?
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:19:34 -0700
Message-ID: <E302F8A8-8762-40F3-9DA2-268210EFE52A@richyen.com> (raw)

Hello,

Wondering what's a good value for effective_io_concurrency when dealing with FusionIO drives...anyone have any experience with this?

I know that SSDs vary from 10 channels to 30, and that 1 SSD about as fast as a 4-drive RAID, but I can't seem to settle on a good value to use for effective_io_concurrency.  Has anyone done any performance testing/metrics with the value?  Any recommendations or thoughts?

--Richard


Message-ID: <E302F8A8-8762-40F3-9DA2-268210EFE52A@richyen.com>
Permalink:  ../E302F8A8-8762-40F3-9DA2-268210EFE52A@richyen.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/E302F8A8-8762-40F3-9DA2-268210EFE52A@richyen.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: dba@richyen.com
  Subject: Re: good effective_io_concurrency for FusionIO drives?
  In-Reply-To: <E302F8A8-8762-40F3-9DA2-268210EFE52A@richyen.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox