From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
Cc: Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres --
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 21:59:06 +0100
Message-ID: <NOEFLCFHBPDAFHEIPGBOEEJACEAA.simon@2ndquadrant.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41485CA6.1080505@joeconway.com>
Joe,
Your application is very interesting. I've just read your OSCON paper. I'd
like to talk more about that. Very similar to Kalido.
...but back to partitioning momentarily: Does the performance gain come from
partition elimination of the inherited tables under the root?
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: simon@2ndquadrant.com, mail@joeconway.com, cbbrowne@acm.org
Subject: Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres --
In-Reply-To: <NOEFLCFHBPDAFHEIPGBOEEJACEAA.simon@2ndquadrant.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox