pg.ddx.io pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archivehelp / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Feature Request --- was: PostgreSQL Performance Tuning
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 21:52:16 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0705012134370.24215@westnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <33127762-7EBB-4D1E-9147-5BFB3EB7A883@earlham.edu>
References: <OFC96167D5.6BB63AC2-ON652572C9.003B5263-652572C9.003E4142@lntinfotech.com>
<20070427143023.GA2422@mathom.us>
<46323744.5020703@drivefaster.net>
<200704271059.50265.josh@agliodbs.com>
<Pine.GSO.4.64.0704292241270.1296@westnet.com>
<463616EB.3040800@modgraph-usa.com>
<33127762-7EBB-4D1E-9147-5BFB3EB7A883@earlham.edu>
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Kevin Hunter wrote:
> I recognize that PostgreSQL and MySQL try to address different
> problem-areas, but is this one reason why a lot of people with whom I
> talk prefer MySQL? Because PostgreSQL is so "slooow" out of the box?
It doesn't help, but there are many other differences that are as big or
bigger. Here are a few samples off the top of my head:
1) Performance issues due to MVCC (MySQL fans love to point out how
fast they can do select count(*) from x)
2) Not knowing you have to run vacuum analyze and therefore never seeing a
good query result
3) Unfair comparison of PostgreSQL with robust WAL vs. MySQL+MyISAM on
write-heavy worksloads
These are real issues, which of course stack on top of things like
outdated opinions from older PG releases with performance issues resolved
in the last few years.
--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
view thread (53+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0705012134370.24215@westnet.com> Permalink: ../Pine.GSO.4.64.0705012134370.24215@westnet.com/ Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/Pine.GSO.4.64.0705012134370.24215@westnet.com ·
reply
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options: reply via email To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Cc: gsmith@gregsmith.com Subject: Re: Feature Request --- was: PostgreSQL Performance Tuning In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0705012134370.24215@westnet.com> * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox