pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Best OS for Postgres 8.2
Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 23:56:14 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0705072330240.24382@westnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1178574927.533849.90730@e51g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
References: <1178574927.533849.90730@e51g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>

On Mon, 7 May 2007, David Levy wrote:

> I am hesitating between Fedora Core 6, CentOS and Debian. Can anyone
> help with this ?

Debian packages PostgreSQL in a fashion unique to it; it's arguable 
whether it's better or not (I don't like it), but going with that will 
assure your installation is a bit non-standard compared with most Linux 
installas.  The main reasons you'd pick Debian are either that you like 
that scheme (which tries to provide some structure to running multiple 
clusters on one box), or that you plan to rely heavily on community 
packages that don't come with the Redhat distributions and therefore would 
appreciate how easy it is to use apt-get against the large Debian software 
repository.

Given the buginess and unexpected changes from packages updates of every 
Fedora Core release I've ever tried, I wouldn't trust any OS from that 
line to run a database keeping track of where my socks are at.  Core 6 
seems better than most of the older ones.  I find it hard to understand 
what it offers that Centos doesn't such that you'd want Fedora instead.

Centos just released a new version 5 recently.  It's running a fairly 
modern kernel with several relevant performance improvements over the much 
older V4; unless you have some odd piece of hardware where there is only a 
driver available for Centos 4 (I ran into this with a disk controller), 
the new version would better.

The main advantages of Centos over the other two are that so many people 
are/will be running very similar configurations that you should able to 
find help easily if you run into any issues.  I revisited fresh installs 
of each recently, and after trying both I found it more comfortable to run 
the database server on Centos, but I did miss the gigantic and easy to 
install Debian software repository.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD



view thread (38+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0705072330240.24382@westnet.com>
Permalink:  ../Pine.GSO.4.64.0705072330240.24382@westnet.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/Pine.GSO.4.64.0705072330240.24382@westnet.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: gsmith@gregsmith.com
  Subject: Re: Best OS for Postgres 8.2
  In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0705072330240.24382@westnet.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox