From: Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Barcelona vs Tigerton
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:11:56 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0709111107090.24969@westnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1IV0cx-0007U9-J2@garm.runbox.com>
References: <E1IV0cx-0007U9-J2@garm.runbox.com>
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Mindaugas wrote:
> Now that both 4x4 out it's time for us to decide which one should be
> better for our PostgreSQL and Oracle.
You're going to have to wait a bit for that. No one has had both to
compare for long enough yet to reach a strong conclusion, and you're
probably going to need a database-specific benchmark before there's useful
data for your case. Yesterday's meta-coverage at Ars was a nice summary
of the current state of things:
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070910-barcelonas-out-and-the-reviews-are-out.html
--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: gsmith@gregsmith.com
Subject: Re: Barcelona vs Tigerton
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0709111107090.24969@westnet.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox