pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
To: 'pgsql-performance' <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 17:40:06 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0712261733390.10252@westnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712261534530.11785@asgard.lang.hm>
References: <0f8201c847f6$08e15090$8f01010a@iptel.com.ar>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0712261317320.11785@asgard.lang.hm>
	<87zlvxnpkl.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
	<4772CA58.5050406@mark.mielke.cc>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0712261504310.11785@asgard.lang.hm>
	<4772CE34.2040608@mark.mielke.cc>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0712261534530.11785@asgard.lang.hm>

On Wed, 26 Dec 2007, david@lang.hm wrote:

> yes, the two linux software implementations only read from one disk, but I 
> have seen hardware implementations where it reads from both drives, and if 
> they disagree it returns a read error rather then possibly invalid data (it's 
> up to the admin to figure out which drive is bad at that point).

Right, many of the old implementations did that; even the Wikipedia 
article on this subject mentions it in the "RAID 1 performance" section: 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_RAID_levels

The thing that changed is on modern drives, the internal error detection 
and correction is good enough that if you lose a sector, the drive will 
normally figure that out at the firmware level and return a read error 
rather than bad data.  That lowers of the odds of one drive becoming 
corrupted and returning a bad sector as a result enough that the overhead 
of reading from both drives isn't considered as important.  I'm not aware 
of a current card that does that but I wouldn't be surprised to discover 
one existed.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD



view thread (37+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0712261733390.10252@westnet.com>
Permalink:  ../Pine.GSO.4.64.0712261733390.10252@westnet.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/Pine.GSO.4.64.0712261733390.10252@westnet.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: gsmith@gregsmith.com
  Subject: Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10
  In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0712261733390.10252@westnet.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox