pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
To: Sean Davis <sdavis2@mail.nih.gov>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [OT] RAID controllers blocking one another?
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:14:31 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0801181400110.19036@westnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <264855a00801180503k14910362p3165b46e8450d045@mail.gmail.com>
References: <264855a00801171217m4e6211e6y5f4d0e12ce86db5c@mail.gmail.com>
	<dcc563d10801171307p4869b0ayc27c3433c19455ba@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0801171807060.18514@westnet.com>
	<264855a00801180503k14910362p3165b46e8450d045@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Sean Davis wrote:

> FYI, here are the specs on the server.
> http://www.thinkmate.com/System/8U_Dual_Xeon_i2SS40-8U_Storage_Server

Now we're getting somewhere.  I'll dump this on-list as it's a good 
example of how to fight this class of performance problems.

The usual troubleshooting procedure is to figure out how the motherboard 
is mapping all the I/O internally and then try to move things out of the 
same path.  That tells us that you have an Intel S5000PSL motherboard, and 
the tech specs are at 
http://support.intel.com/support/motherboards/server/s5000psl/sb/CS-022619.htm

What you want to stare at is the block diagram that's Figure 10, page 27 
(usually this isn't in the motherboard documentation, and instead you have 
to drill down into the chipset documentation to find it).  Slots 5 and 6 
that have PCI Express x16 connectors (but run at x8 speed) both go 
straight into the memory hub.  Slots 3 and 4, which are x8 but run at x4 
speed, go through the I/O controller first.  Those should be slower, so if 
you put a card into there it will have a degraded top-end performance 
compared to slots 5/6.

Line that up with the layout in Figure 2, page 17, and you should be able 
to get an idea what the possibilities are for moving the cards around and 
what the trade-offs involved are.  Ideally you'd want both 3Ware cards to 
be in slots 5+6, but if that's your current configuration you could try 
moving the less important of the two (maybe the one with less drives) to 
either slot 3/4 and see if the contention you're seeing drops.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD



view thread (8+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0801181400110.19036@westnet.com>
Permalink:  ../Pine.GSO.4.64.0801181400110.19036@westnet.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/Pine.GSO.4.64.0801181400110.19036@westnet.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: gsmith@gregsmith.com, sdavis2@mail.nih.gov
  Subject: Re: [OT] RAID controllers blocking one another?
  In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0801181400110.19036@westnet.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox