From: Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
To: Henrik <henke@mac.se>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Filesystem benchmarking for pg 8.3.3 server
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:56:22 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0808111136440.25081@westnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0E80D962-22F4-4669-B09F-E1E44449BF76@mac.se>
References: <32A7A76B-16CA-4CDB-AD43-973AD6A3FC7B@mac.se>
<Pine.GSO.4.64.0808081835320.21924@westnet.com>
<0E80D962-22F4-4669-B09F-E1E44449BF76@mac.se>
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008, Henrik wrote:
>> Normally, when a SATA implementation is running significantly faster than a
>> SAS one, it's because there's some write cache in the SATA disks turned on
>> (which they usually are unless you go out of your way to disable them).
> Lucky for my I have BBU on all my controllers cards and I'm also not using
> the SATA drives for database.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: gsmith@gregsmith.com, henke@mac.se
Subject: Re: Filesystem benchmarking for pg 8.3.3 server
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0808111136440.25081@westnet.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox