From: Charles Sprickman <spork@bway.net>
To: david@lang.hm
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 18:40:33 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <Pine.OSX.4.64.0704061838560.23748@white.nat.fasttrackmonkey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704061503230.17492@asgard.lang.hm>
References: <HCEPKPMCAJLDGJIBCLGHEENIHGAA.james@mansionfamily.plus.com>
<1175807611.9839.120.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
<Pine.GSO.4.64.0704060019020.7614@westnet.com>
<1175872847.9839.146.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
<Pine.LNX.4.64.0704061503230.17492@asgard.lang.hm>
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, david@lang.hm wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
>> Based on experience I think that on average server drives are more
>> reliable than consumer grade drives, and can take more punishment.
>
> this I am not sure about
I think they should survey Tivo owners next time.
Perfect stress-testing environment. Mine runs at over 50C most of the
time, and it's writing 2 video streams 24/7. What more could you do to
punish a drive? :)
Charles
>
> David Lang
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: spork@bway.net, david@lang.hm
Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSX.4.64.0704061838560.23748@white.nat.fasttrackmonkey.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox