pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Poor performance when deleting from entity-attribute-value type master-table
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 22:50:31 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <VisenaEmail.71.c67d5354b8430fbc.14b704873bd@tc7-visena> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A76B25F2823E954C9E45E32FA49D70ECC229EC97@mail.corp.perceptron.com>
List-Unsubscribe:  <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>

På mandag 09. februar 2015 kl. 22:36:55, skrev Igor Neyman <
ineyman@perceptron.com <mailto:ineyman@perceptron.com>>:  

 

From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org 
[mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Andreas Joseph Krogh
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2015 4:13 PM
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: [PERFORM] Poor performance when deleting from entity-attribute-value 
type master-table

 

Hi all.

 

Using PG-9.4.0 I'm seeing this trying to delete from an "entity"-master table:

 

*# explain analyze     delete from onp_crm_entity where entity_id IN (select 
tmp.delivery_id from temp_delete_delivery_id tmp);
                                                                     QUERY 
PLAN                                                                     
 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Delete on onp_crm_entity  (cost=0.43..5673.40 rows=1770 width=12) (actual 
time=7.370..7.370 rows=0 loops=1)
    ->  Nested Loop  (cost=0.43..5673.40 rows=1770 width=12) (actual 
time=0.050..1.374 rows=108 loops=1)
          ->  Seq Scan on temp_delete_delivery_id tmp  (cost=0.00..27.70 
rows=1770 width=14) (actual time=0.014..0.080 rows=108 loops=1)
          ->  Index Scan using onp_crm_entity_pkey on onp_crm_entity  
(cost=0.43..3.18 rows=1 width=14) (actual time=0.010..0.011 rows=1 loops=108)
                Index Cond: (entity_id = tmp.delivery_id)
  Planning time: 0.314 ms
  Trigger for constraint onp_crm_activity_entity_id_fkey: time=4.141 calls=108

 Trigger for constraint ...

 Trigger for constraint ...

 Trigger for constraint ...

 

 

I have lots of tables referencing onp_crm_entity(entity_id) so I expect the 
poor performance of deleting from it is caused by all the triggers firing to 
check FKI-constraints.

 

 

Andreas, do you have indexes on FK columns in child tables?

If not – there is your problem.

  Yes, they have indexes, but deleting 1M rows still results in calling the 
triggers 1M times * number of FKs...   -- Andreas Joseph Krogh CTO / Partner - 
Visena AS Mobile: +47 909 56 963 andreas@visena.com <mailto:andreas@visena.com> 
www.visena.com <https://www.visena.com;  <https://www.visena.com;  

view thread (5+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <VisenaEmail.71.c67d5354b8430fbc.14b704873bd@tc7-visena>
Permalink:  ../VisenaEmail.71.c67d5354b8430fbc.14b704873bd@tc7-visena/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/VisenaEmail.71.c67d5354b8430fbc.14b704873bd@tc7-visena

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: andreas@visena.com
  Subject: Re: Poor performance when deleting from entity-attribute-value type master-table
  In-Reply-To: <VisenaEmail.71.c67d5354b8430fbc.14b704873bd@tc7-visena>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox