pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Questionaire: Common WAL write rates on busy servers.
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 09:31:34 -0700
Message-ID: <a842fbdf-b761-bf21-47dd-cd87d05a8d04@commandprompt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170427155906.uudovtd62x56brmx@alap3.anarazel.de>
References: <20170425041743.ddabv2mwevcmtx5a@alap3.anarazel.de>
	<20170427155906.uudovtd62x56brmx@alap3.anarazel.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-general>

On 04/27/2017 08:59 AM, Andres Freund wrote:

>
> Ok, based on the, few, answers I've got so far, my experience is indeed
> skewed.  A number of the PG users I interacted with over the last couple
> years had WAL write ranges somewhere in the range of 500MB/s to 2.2GB/s
> (max I'veseen).  At that point WAL insertion became a major bottleneck,
> even if storage was more than fast enough to keep up.  To address these
> we'd need some changes, but the feedback so far suggest that it's not
> yet a widespread issue...

I would agree it isn't yet a widespread issue.

The only people that are likely going to see this are going to be on 
bare metal. We should definitely plan on that issue for say 11. I do 
have a question though, where you have seen this issue is it with 
synchronous_commit on or off?

Thanks,

JD



-- 
Command Prompt, Inc.                  http://the.postgres.company/
                         +1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general



view thread (15+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <a842fbdf-b761-bf21-47dd-cd87d05a8d04@commandprompt.com>
Permalink:  ../a842fbdf-b761-bf21-47dd-cd87d05a8d04@commandprompt.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/a842fbdf-b761-bf21-47dd-cd87d05a8d04@commandprompt.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: jd@commandprompt.com, andres@anarazel.de, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Questionaire: Common WAL write rates on busy servers.
  In-Reply-To: <a842fbdf-b761-bf21-47dd-cd87d05a8d04@commandprompt.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox