public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]>
Cc: Marcos Pegoraro <[email protected]>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <[email protected]>
Cc: jian he <[email protected]>
Cc: Dmitry Dolgov <[email protected]>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <[email protected]>
Cc: Erik Rijkers <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
Cc: Amit Kapila <[email protected]>
Cc: DUVAL REMI <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: proposal: schema variables
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 16:28:01 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <CAFj8pRC_2tHski1K4hUMZm0+T4y7na4d8hwgMMF7Y0MXhfUhbg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAB-JLwaOdMQN838Fy2r2qZLTExfJp0zcjQjmOFVRXhW_-uDNVw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFj8pRArtw+Qqzk+Zf2NxjgO=paCBdc54eEma+MsVwtx3j7Atg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFj8pRAK_8ym1J=SAdin-vtL0PAachXgjWgU3QrhzinRdBX2sw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFj8pRAx-Gb9Ux825cxGNm38qQUOrij1GY6erPRaQ=cpqfiX7g@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFj8pRCEjG005L=1vGbir-odYdcYxByOAeFVJ_K9eRcRF=MbNQ@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAB-JLwY2-Hm_SYbj2td_VKuU8awCwgDr-sOtjHRE2C-Sgg_pFg@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 08:47:36PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 20 May 2025, at 18:39, Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> wrote:
> > My only point is that we should only be using email lists for work that
> > is being actively worked on to be added to community Postgres. There
> > has been talk of a trimmed-down version of this being applied, but I
> > don't see any work in that direction.
> >
> > This patch should be moved to a separate location where perhaps people
> > can subscribe to updates when they are posted, perhaps github.
>
> As a project with no roadmap governed by open forum consensus I don't think we
> have any right to tell community members what they can or cannot work on here,
> any technical discussion which conforms with our published policies should be
> welcome. If Pavel want's to continue rebasing his patchset here then he has,
> IMHO, every right to do so.
>
> Whether or not a committer will show interest at some point is another thing,
> but we are seeing a very good role-model for taking responsibility for ones
> work here at the very least =)
Well, we do have a right, e.g., we would not allow someone to repeatedly
post patches for a Postgres extension we don't manage, or the jdbc
driver. I also don't think we would allow someone to continue posting
patches for a feature we have decided to reject, and I think we have
decided to reject the patch in in its current form. I think we might
accept a trimmed-down version, but I don't see the patch moving in that
direction.
Now, of course, if I am the only one who feels this way, I can suppress
these emails on my end.
--
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
view thread (439+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: proposal: schema variables
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox