pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
To: Jignesh K. Shah <J.K.Shah@Sun.COM>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: 8.4 Performance improvements:  was Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:15:32 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <alpine.GSO.2.01.0903131308540.27393@westnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49BA5537.8060002@sun.com>
References: <C5DDBB25.3333%scott@richrelevance.com>
	<49B922C0.6050700@sun.com>
	<alpine.GSO.2.01.0903121613270.1925@westnet.com>
	<49BA5537.8060002@sun.com>

On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Jignesh K. Shah wrote:

> I can use dbt2, dbt3 tests to see how 8.4 performs and compare it with 
> 8.3?

That would be very helpful.  There's been some work at updating the DTrace 
capabilities available too; you might compare what that's reporting too.

> * Visibility map - Reduce Vacuum overhead - (I think I can time vacuum with 
> some usage on both databases)

The reduced vacuum overhead should show up as just better overall 
performance.  If you can seperate out the vacuum specific time that would 
be great, I don't know that it's essential.  If the changes don't just 
make a plain old speed improvement in your tests that would be a problem 
worth reporting.

> * Parallel pg_restore (Can be tested with a big database dump)

It would be particularly useful if you could throw some of your 32+ core 
systems at a parallel restore of something with a bunch of tables.  I 
don't think there have been (m)any tests of that code on Solaris or with 
that many restore workers yet.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD




view thread (14+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <alpine.GSO.2.01.0903131308540.27393@westnet.com>
Permalink:  ../alpine.GSO.2.01.0903131308540.27393@westnet.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/alpine.GSO.2.01.0903131308540.27393@westnet.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: gsmith@gregsmith.com, J.K.Shah@Sun.COM
  Subject: Re: 8.4 Performance improvements:  was Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4
  In-Reply-To: <alpine.GSO.2.01.0903131308540.27393@westnet.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox