From: Claus Guttesen <kometen@gmail.com>
To: PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: hp ciss on freebsd
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 14:19:18 +0100
Message-ID: <b41c75520711050519x75665f8etec7f776792f037@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi.
We are using a HP DL 380 G5 with 4 sas-disks at 10K rpm. The
controller is a built in ciss-controller with 256 MB battery-backed
cache. It is partitioned as raid 1+0.
Our queries are mainly selects.
I will get four 72 GB sas-disks at 15K rpm. Reading the archives
suggest raid 1+0 for optimal read/write performance, but with a solid
raid-controller raid 5 will also perform very well when reading.
Is the ciss-controller found in HP-servers a "better" raid-controller
compared to the areca-raid-controller mentioned on this list?
--
regards
Claus
When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom,
the gentlest gamester is the soonest winner.
Shakespeare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: kometen@gmail.com
Subject: Re: hp ciss on freebsd
In-Reply-To: <b41c75520711050519x75665f8etec7f776792f037@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox