pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
To: Guillaume Cottenceau <gc@mnc.ch>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: increasing shared buffers: how much should be removed from OS filesystem cache?
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 15:49:43 -0400
Message-ID: <b42b73150609011249p612ccd27gbb5ee4db9b5b10f4@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87veo7a5dn.fsf@meuh.mnc.lan>
References: <87veo7a5dn.fsf@meuh.mnc.lan>

On 01 Sep 2006 19:00:52 +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau <gc@mnc.ch> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been looking at the results from the pg_statio* tables, to
> view the impact of increasing the shared buffers to increase
> performance.
>

I think 'shared buffers' is one of the most overrated settings from a
performance standpoint.  however you must ensure there is enough for
things the server does besides caching.  It used to be a bigger deal
than it is in modern versionf of postgresql modern operating systems.

merlin



view thread (10+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <b42b73150609011249p612ccd27gbb5ee4db9b5b10f4@mail.gmail.com>
Permalink:  ../b42b73150609011249p612ccd27gbb5ee4db9b5b10f4@mail.gmail.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/b42b73150609011249p612ccd27gbb5ee4db9b5b10f4@mail.gmail.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: mmoncure@gmail.com, gc@mnc.ch
  Subject: Re: increasing shared buffers: how much should be removed from OS filesystem cache?
  In-Reply-To: <b42b73150609011249p612ccd27gbb5ee4db9b5b10f4@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox