From: Mike Rylander <mrylander@gmail.com>
To: Mohan, Ross <RMohan@arbinet.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Table Partitioning: Will it be supported in Future?
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 00:42:10 +0000
Message-ID: <b918cf3d0504261742d98c75@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CC74E7E10A8A054798B6611BD1FEF4D307966BF5@vamail01.thexchange.com>
References: <CC74E7E10A8A054798B6611BD1FEF4D307966BF5@vamail01.thexchange.com>
On 4/26/05, Mohan, Ross <RMohan@arbinet.com> wrote:
> Maybe he needs to spend $7K on performance improvements?
>
> ;-)
>
AAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!
I will forever hate the number 7,000 from this day forth!
Seriously, though, I've never seen a thread on any list wander on so
aimlessly for so long.
Please, mommy, make it stop!
--
Mike Rylander
mrylander@gmail.com
GPLS -- PINES Development
Database Developer
http://open-ils.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: mrylander@gmail.com, RMohan@arbinet.com
Subject: Re: Table Partitioning: Will it be supported in Future?
In-Reply-To: <b918cf3d0504261742d98c75@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox