From: creimer@brturbo.com.br
To: Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Context switch storm
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 11:28:36 -0200
Message-ID: <c4069b084d04.454b27e4@brturbo.com.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <454B3B75.6@archonet.com>
References: <efc1d7c07cf.454afe8d@brturbo.com.br>
<454B3B75.6@archonet.com>
> If you can keep your numbers of clients down below the critical
> level,
> you should find the overall workload is fine.
We have at about 600 connections. Is this a case to use a connection pool (pg_pool) system?
And why this happens only with 8.0 and 8.1 and not with the 7.4?
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: creimer@brturbo.com.br, dev@archonet.com
Subject: Re: Context switch storm
In-Reply-To: <c4069b084d04.454b27e4@brturbo.com.br>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox