pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: query slowdown after 9.0 -> 9.4 migration
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 00:55:22 +0200
Message-ID: <c933c63e-4050-49ef-566c-0b40de1f46dd@2ndquadrant.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP_rwwn6AqwfCDsmpzVaoZd_6FSu7RFECqqfUPGf2n9uv+VVuA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAP_rwwn6AqwfCDsmpzVaoZd_6FSu7RFECqqfUPGf2n9uv+VVuA@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe:  <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>

On 10/26/2016 03:48 PM, Filip RembiaƂkowski wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Query run time degraded after migration from Pg 9.0 + postgis 1.5 to Pg
> 9.4 + postgis 2.2.
>
> 1 ms versus 7 ms.
>
> Same query, same data, same schema, similar hardware. Data is small and
> fits in cache.
>
> EXPLAIN shows heap scan cost increase. What can be the reason for
> 40-fold increase in page scans needed to run Bitmap Heap Scan with
> Filter and Recheck?
>

On 9.0 the the scan accesses only 8 buffers:

Buffers: shared hit=8

while on 9.4 it has to inspect 316 of them:

Buffers: shared hit=316

Perhaps the table is organized / sorted differently, or something like 
that. How did you do the upgrade?


ragards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance



view thread (5+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <c933c63e-4050-49ef-566c-0b40de1f46dd@2ndquadrant.com>
Permalink:  ../c933c63e-4050-49ef-566c-0b40de1f46dd@2ndquadrant.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/c933c63e-4050-49ef-566c-0b40de1f46dd@2ndquadrant.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com
  Subject: Re: query slowdown after 9.0 -> 9.4 migration
  In-Reply-To: <c933c63e-4050-49ef-566c-0b40de1f46dd@2ndquadrant.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox