From: Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Marc Cousin <mcousin@sigma.fr>
Cc: Chris <dmagick@gmail.com>
Cc: Pgsql performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Inserts optimization?
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 13:50:30 -0400
Message-ID: <cone.1145037030.537508.283.5001@35st-server.simplicato.com> (raw)
References: <cone.1144953939.190214.95544.5001@35st-server.simplicato.com>
<200604141400.38982.mcousin@sigma.fr>
<cone.1145031012.290269.26335.1000@zoraida.natserv.net>
<10151.1145032219@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Tom Lane writes:
> That will help not at all, if the problem is too-short transactions
> as it sounds to be.
How about commit_delay?
> You really need to pester the authors of bacula
> to try to wrap multiple inserts per transaction.
Like any volunteer project I am sure it's more an issue of resources than an
issue of interest.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: lists@stringsutils.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, mcousin@sigma.fr, dmagick@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Inserts optimization?
In-Reply-To: <cone.1145037030.537508.283.5001@35st-server.simplicato.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox