From: Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com>
To: Ireneusz Pluta <ipluta@wp.pl>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: 3ware vs. MegaRAID
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:59:52 -0400
Message-ID: <cone.1270054792.255444.18171.1000@shelca> (raw)
References: <4BB1FAAF.7050406@wp.pl>
Ireneusz Pluta writes:
> I am waiting for an ordered machine dedicated to PostgresSQL. It was
> expected to have 3ware 9650SE 16 port controller. However, the vendor
> wants to replace this controller with MegaRAID SAS 84016E, because, as
I have had better luck getting 3ware management tools to work on both
FreeBSD and Linux than the Megaraid cards.
I also like the 3ware cards can be configured to send out an email in case
of problems once you have the monitoring program running.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: lists@stringsutils.com, ipluta@wp.pl
Subject: Re: 3ware vs. MegaRAID
In-Reply-To: <cone.1270054792.255444.18171.1000@shelca>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox