From: William Yu <wyu@talisys.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Postgresql Performance via the LSI MegaRAID 2x Card
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 14:15:28 -0700
Message-ID: <d68e5k$2o0h$1@news.hub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200505131728.46276.josh@agliodbs.com>
References: <42854341.6030702@sfnet.cc>
<200505131728.46276.josh@agliodbs.com>
I'm sure there's some corner case where more memory helps. If you
consider that 1GB of RAM is about $100, I'd max out memory on the
controller just for the hell of it.
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Steve,
>
>
>>Past recommendations for a good RAID card (for SCSI) have been the LSI
>>MegaRAID 2x. This unit comes with 128MB of RAM on-board. Has anyone
>>found by increasing the on-board RAM, did Postgresql performed better?
>
>
> My informal tests showed no difference between 64MB and 256MB.
>
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: wyu@talisys.com
Subject: Re: Postgresql Performance via the LSI MegaRAID 2x Card
In-Reply-To: <d68e5k$2o0h$1@news.hub.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox