pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Yu <wyu@talisys.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Help specifying new web server/database machine
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 12:53:38 -0700
Message-ID: <d8a6o5$9ep$1@news.hub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050609164420.GA3649@campbell-lange.net>
References: <20050608163418.GA3327@campbell-lange.net>
	<d87v84$2ihi$1@news.hub.org>
	<20050609164420.GA3649@campbell-lange.net>

Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> Processor:
> 
> First of all I noted that we were intending to use Opteron processors. I
> guess this isn't a straightforward choice because I believe Debian (our
> Linux of choice) doesn't have a stable AMD64 port. However some users on
> this list suggest that Opterons work very well even in a 32 bit
> environment. Some have suggested that a single dual core processor is
> the way to go. The RAM needs to fit the CPU arrangement too; William
> points out that one needs 2 DIMMS per CPU.


Your summary here just pointed out the obvious to me. Start with a 2P MB 
but only populate a single DC Opteron. That'll give you 2P system with 
room to expand to 4P in the future. Plus you only need to populate 1 
memory bank so you can do 2x1GB.

> Disks:
> 
> I'm somewhat confused here. I've followed the various notes about SATA
> vs SCSI and it seems that SCSI is the way to go. On a four-slot 1U
> server, would one do a single RAID10 over 4 disks 10000rpm U320 disks?
> I would run the database in its own partition, separate from the rest of
> the OS, possible on LVM. An LSI-Megaraid-2 appears to be the card of
> choice.

With only 4 disks, a MegaRAID U320-1 is good enough. It's quite a 
premium to go to the 2x channel MegaRAID. With 4 drives, I'd still do 2 
big drives mirrored for the DB partition and 2 small drives for OS+WAL.



view thread (11+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <d8a6o5$9ep$1@news.hub.org>
Permalink:  ../d8a6o5$9ep$1@news.hub.org/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/d8a6o5$9ep$1@news.hub.org

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: wyu@talisys.com
  Subject: Re: Help specifying new web server/database machine
  In-Reply-To: <d8a6o5$9ep$1@news.hub.org>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox