From: Relaxin <me@yourhouse.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: PostgresSQL vs. Firebird
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 00:19:34 -0700
Message-ID: <db53m4$520$1@news.hub.org> (raw)
Before I ask, I don't want to start a war.
Can someone here give me an honest opinion of how PostgresSQL (PG) is better
than Firebird on Windows?
I've just recently started reading the Firebird NG and a poster over there
has brought up some serious issues with Firebird, but they seem to not take
the issues seriously.
I first wanted to go with Firebird for 2 reasons...
Very easy to configure and very easy to install.
I assumed that the database worked ok, but I'm not so sure now.
So, I've decided to give PG a try...I've downloaded it, but haven't
installed it yet.
So any provable information that you can provide as to why/how PG is
better/faster/easier/reliable than Firebird would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: me@yourhouse.com
Subject: Re: PostgresSQL vs. Firebird
In-Reply-To: <db53m4$520$1@news.hub.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox