pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
To: Harsh Azad <harsh.azad@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: SAN vs Internal Disks
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 13:07:43 -0500
Message-ID: <dcc563d10709061107q7177441elcd6fd8c45fdecce3@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a199704d0709061003u71d536fbh9d71ed095dfe16b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <a199704d0709060535q6fea139aq2e3863e685555b0d@mail.gmail.com>
	<dcc563d10709060925o6f11f632sbfbc2b64530ae80d@mail.gmail.com>
	<a199704d0709061003u71d536fbh9d71ed095dfe16b@mail.gmail.com>

On 9/6/07, Harsh Azad <harsh.azad@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Scott, we have now requested IBM/EMC to provide test machines.
> Interestingly since you mentioned the importance of Raid controllers and the
> drivers; we are planning to use Cent OS 5 for hosting the DB.

What RAID controllers have you looked at.  Seems the two most popular
in terms of performance here have been Areca and 3Ware / Escalade.
LSI seems to come in a pretty close third.  Adaptec is to be avoided
as are cheap RAID controllers (i.e. promise etc...)  battery backed
cache is a must, and the bigger the better.

> Firstly, I could only find postgres 8.1.x RPM for CentOS 5, could not find
> any RPM for 8.2.4. Is there any 8.2.4 RPM for CentOS 5?
>
> Secondly, would investing into Redhat enterprise edition give any
> performance advantage? I know all the SAN boxes are only certified on RHEL
> and not CentOS. Or since CentOS is similar to RHEL it would be fine?

for all intents and purposes, CentOS and RHEL are the same OS, so any
pgsql rpm for one should pretty much work for the other.  At the
worst, you might have to get a srpm and rebuild it for CentOS / White
Box.



view thread (37+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <dcc563d10709061107q7177441elcd6fd8c45fdecce3@mail.gmail.com>
Permalink:  ../dcc563d10709061107q7177441elcd6fd8c45fdecce3@mail.gmail.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/dcc563d10709061107q7177441elcd6fd8c45fdecce3@mail.gmail.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: scott.marlowe@gmail.com, harsh.azad@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: SAN vs Internal Disks
  In-Reply-To: <dcc563d10709061107q7177441elcd6fd8c45fdecce3@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox