From: Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
To: Loic Petit <tls.wydd@free.fr>
Cc: max@nts.biz.ua
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Large number of tables slow insert
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:18:43 -0600
Message-ID: <dcc563d10808231818l4ad52e58k6b29ba92d6bc51e4@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1775c5ea0808231759x6b43520du4f949dbe25f4b316@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1775c5ea0808231759x6b43520du4f949dbe25f4b316@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Loic Petit <tls.wydd@free.fr> wrote:
> 1 table contains about 5 indexes : timestamp, one for each sensor type - 3,
> and one for packet counting (measures packet dropping)
> (I reckon that this is quite heavy, but a least the timestamp and the values
> are really usefull)
But what's the update rate on these indexes and tables? I'm wondering
if you're not vacuuming aggresively enough to keep up with bursty
update patterns
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: scott.marlowe@gmail.com, tls.wydd@free.fr, max@nts.biz.ua
Subject: Re: Large number of tables slow insert
In-Reply-To: <dcc563d10808231818l4ad52e58k6b29ba92d6bc51e4@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox