pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
To: Mario Weilguni <mweilguni@sime.com>
Cc: Alan Hodgson <ahodgson@simkin.ca>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 08:30:38 -0700
Message-ID: <dcc563d10812090730h2ae6658cj5fdc2554600efd40@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <493E61E1.1020303@sime.com>
References: <4934FE60.30702@sime.com>
	<49395B57.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov>
	<200812051530.01258@hal.medialogik.com>
	<493E61E1.1020303@sime.com>

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 5:17 AM, Mario Weilguni <mweilguni@sime.com> wrote:
> Alan Hodgson schrieb:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mario Weilguni <mweilguni@sime.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> strange values. An individual drive is capable of delivering 91
>>>> MB/sec
>>>>      sequential read performance, and we get values ~102MB/sec out of a
>>>> 8-drive RAID5, seems to be ridiculous slow.
>>
>>
>> What command are you using to test the reads?
>>
>> Some recommendations to try:
>>
>> 1) /sbin/blockdev --setra 2048 device (where device is the partition or
>> LVM volume)
>>
>> 2) Use XFS, and make sure your stripe settings match the RAID.
>>
>> Having said that, 102MB/sec sounds really low for any modern controller
>> with 8 drives, regardless of tuning or filesystem choice.
>>
>>
>
> First, thanks alot for this and all the other answers.
>
> I measured the raw device performance:
> dd if=/dev/cciss/c0d0 bs=64k count=100000 of=/dev/null
>
> I get poor performance when all 8 drives are configured as one, large
> RAID-5, and slightly poorer performance when configured as JBOD. In
> production, we use XFS as FS, but I doubt this has anything to do with FS
> tuning.

Yeah, having just trawled the pgsql-performance archives, there are
plenty of instances of people having terrible performance from HP
smart array controllers before the P800.  Is it possible for you to
trade up to a better RAID controller?  Whichever salesman sold you the
P400 should take one for the team and make this right for you.



view thread (33+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <dcc563d10812090730h2ae6658cj5fdc2554600efd40@mail.gmail.com>
Permalink:  ../dcc563d10812090730h2ae6658cj5fdc2554600efd40@mail.gmail.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/dcc563d10812090730h2ae6658cj5fdc2554600efd40@mail.gmail.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: scott.marlowe@gmail.com, mweilguni@sime.com, ahodgson@simkin.ca
  Subject: Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
  In-Reply-To: <dcc563d10812090730h2ae6658cj5fdc2554600efd40@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox