From: Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
To: Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com>
Cc: Pgsql performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 20:26:58 -0700
Message-ID: <dcc563d11003021926l16daf2a3t78869a6a9a53271a@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cone.1267584242.708537.32557.1000@shelca>
References: <cone.1267562557.293175.32557.1000@shelca>
<4B8D7A6C.3010304@gmail.com>
<cone.1267565315.87109.32557.1000@shelca>
<4B8DA2D4.8000501@2ndquadrant.com>
<cone.1267584242.708537.32557.1000@shelca>
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com> wrote:
> Greg Smith writes:
>
>> http://www.3ware.com/KB/Article.aspx?id=15383 I consider them still a
>> useful vendor for SATA controllers, but would never buy a SAS solution from
>> them again until this is resolved.
>
>
> Who are you using for SAS?
> One thing I like about 3ware is their management utility works under both
> FreeBSD and Linux well.
The non-open source nature of the command line tool for Areca makes me
avoid their older cards. The 1680 has it's own ethernet wtih a web
interface with snmp that is independent of the OS. This means that
with something like a hung / panicked kernel, you can still check out
the RAID array and check rebuild status and other stuff. We get a
hang about every 180 to 460 days with them where the raid driver in
linux hangs with the array going off-line. It's still there to the
web interface on its own NIC. Newer kernels seem to trigger the
failure far more often, once every 1 to 2 weeks, two months on the
outside. The driver guy from Areca is supposed to be working on the
driver for linux, so we'll see if it gets fixed. It's pretty stable
on a RHEL 5.2 kernel, on anything after that I've tested, it'll hang
every week or two. So I run RHEL 5.latest with a 5.2 kernel and it
works pretty well. Note that this is a pretty heavily used machine
with enough access going through 12 drives to use about 30% IOwait,
50% user, 10% sys at peak midday. Load factor 7 to 15. And they run
really ultra-smooth between these hangs. They come back up
uncorrupted, every time, every plug pull test etc. Other than the
occasional rare hang, they're perfect.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: scott.marlowe@gmail.com, lists@stringsutils.com, greg@2ndquadrant.com, yebhavinga@gmail.com
Subject: Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics
In-Reply-To: <dcc563d11003021926l16daf2a3t78869a6a9a53271a@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox