From: Michael Riess <mlriess@gmx.de>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: postgresql performance tuning
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 22:02:05 +0100
Message-ID: <dn4u86$1ff$1@news.hub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0512061142250.21937@karadi.cs.wisc.edu>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0512061142250.21937@karadi.cs.wisc.edu>
Ameet Kini schrieb:
>
> This didn't get through the first time around, so resending it again.
> Sorry for any duplicate entries.
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a question on postgres's performance tuning, in particular, the
> vacuum and reindex commands. Currently I do a vacuum (without full) on all
> of my tables.
I'm curious ... why no full vacuum? I bet that the full vacuum will
compact your (index) tables as much as a reindex would.
I guess the best advice is to increase FSM and to use autovacuum.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: mlriess@gmx.de
Subject: Re: postgresql performance tuning
In-Reply-To: <dn4u86$1ff$1@news.hub.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox