From: Michael Riess <mlriess@gmx.de>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Autovacuum / full vacuum
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:33:02 +0100
Message-ID: <dqih4p$1clg$1@news.hub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43CCC711.504@familyhealth.com.au>
References: <dqigaf$1b98$1@news.hub.org>
<43CCC711.504@familyhealth.com.au>
Hi,
did you read my post? In the first part I explained why I don't want to
increase the FSM that much.
Mike
>> So my question is: What's the use of an autovacuum daemon if I still
>> have to use a cron job to do full vacuums? wouldn't it just be a minor
>> job to enhance autovacuum to be able to perform full vacuums, if one
>> really wants it to do that - even if some developers think that it's
>> the wrong approach?
>
> You should never have to do full vacuums...
>
> Chris
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: mlriess@gmx.de
Subject: Re: Autovacuum / full vacuum
In-Reply-To: <dqih4p$1clg$1@news.hub.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox