From: Carl Youngblood <carl@youngbloods.org>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Beginner optimization questions, esp. regarding Tsearch2
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:49:04 -0600
Message-ID: <e5ed7b690608151149o48838355u66e441d30f84af3e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060815150529.GO27928@pervasive.com>
References: <e5ed7b690608092100v43590a8epdbdec7afa847c722@mail.gmail.com>
<44DAFB2B.4070307@archonet.com>
<20060815150529.GO27928@pervasive.com>
By the way, can you please post a link to that thread?
On 8/15/06, Jim C. Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com> wrote:
> See the recent thread about how old rules of thumb for shared_buffers
> are now completely bunk. With 4G of memory, setting shared_buffers to 2G
> could easily be reasonable. The OP really needs to test several
> different values with their actual workload and see what works best.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: carl@youngbloods.org
Subject: Re: Beginner optimization questions, esp. regarding Tsearch2
In-Reply-To: <e5ed7b690608151149o48838355u66e441d30f84af3e@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox