From: Andrus <eetasoft@online.ee>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Why date index is not used
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 12:40:26 +0300
Message-ID: <e6bgd4$1vgk$2@news.hub.org> (raw)
References: <44887875.8000502@fuzzy.cz>
<01de01c68b37$33e22a80$8300a8c0@tridecap.com>
> Actually It looks to me like the sorting is the slow part of this query.
> Maybe if you did create an index on both kuupaev and kellaaeg it might
> make the sorting faster.
Thank you. It makes query fast.
> Or maybe you could try increasing the server's
> work mem. The sort will be much slower if the server can't do the whole
> thing in ram.
I have W2K server with 0.5 GB RAM
there are only 6 connections open ( 6 point of sales) to this server.
shared_buffes is 10000
I see approx 10 postgres processes in task manager each taking about 30 MB
ram
Server prefomance is very slow: Windows swap file size is 1 GB
For each sale a new row will be inserted to this table. So the file size
grows rapidly every day.
Changing work_mem by 1 MB increares memory requirment by 10 MB since I may
have 10 processes running. Sorting in memory this table requires very large
amout of work_mem for each process address space.
I think that if I increase work_mem then swap file will became bigger and
perfomance will decrease even more.
How to increase perfomance ?
Andrus.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: eetasoft@online.ee
Subject: Re: Why date index is not used
In-Reply-To: <e6bgd4$1vgk$2@news.hub.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox