From: Sabin Coanda <sabin.coanda@deuromedia.ro>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: VACUUM vs auto-vacuum daemon
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:42:10 +0300
Message-ID: <f4micm$1cq6$1@news.hub.org> (raw)
References: <f4mfin$1vjf$1@news.hub.org>
<20070612122555.2b0f4fa0.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>
Hi Bill,
...
>
> However, you can get some measure of tracking my running VACUUM VERBOSE
> on a regular basis to see how well autovacuum is keeping up. There's
> no problem with running manual vacuum and autovacuum together, and you'll
> be able to gather _some_ information about how well autovacuum is
> keeping up.
Well, I think it is useful just if I am able to synchronize the autovacuum
to run always after I run vacuum verbose. But I don't know how to do that.
Do you ?
Sabin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: sabin.coanda@deuromedia.ro
Subject: Re: VACUUM vs auto-vacuum daemon
In-Reply-To: <f4micm$1cq6$1@news.hub.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox