From: Carlo Stonebanks <stonec.register@sympatico.ca>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Fast tsearch2, trigram matching on short phrases
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:31:08 -0400
Message-ID: <fai6ct$2o8s$1@news.hub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708222248020.2727@sn.sai.msu.ru>
References: <fahmm4$ffo$1@news.hub.org>
<Pine.LNX.4.64.0708222248020.2727@sn.sai.msu.ru>
Hi Oleg,
> you didn't show us explain analyze of your select.
I didn't because I didn't expect any reaction to it - my understanding is
that trigram matching for phrases is not recommended because of the
performance. Do you believe that I SHOULD expect good performance from
trigram matching on phrases (a sopposed to words)?
Carlo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: stonec.register@sympatico.ca
Subject: Re: Fast tsearch2, trigram matching on short phrases
In-Reply-To: <fai6ct$2o8s$1@news.hub.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox