From: Carlo Stonebanks <stonec.register@sympatico.ca>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: random_page_costs - are defaults of 4.0 realistic for SCSI RAID 1
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:25:41 -0400
Message-ID: <fc45mi$1tj9$1@news.hub.org> (raw)
Can anyone answer this for me: Although I realize my client's disk subsystem
(SCSI/RAID Smart Array E200 controller using RAID 1) is less than
impressive - is the default setting of 4.0 realistic or could it be lower?
Thanks!
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: stonec.register@sympatico.ca
Subject: Re: random_page_costs - are defaults of 4.0 realistic for SCSI RAID 1
In-Reply-To: <fc45mi$1tj9$1@news.hub.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox