pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Meetesh Karia <meetesh.karia@gmail.com>
To: Tobias Brox <tobias@nordicbet.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Planner incorrectly choosing seq scan over index scan
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 01:30:26 +0200
Message-ID: <fc5b04ca0508011630e745176@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050801223708.GE17649@tobias.lan>
References: <fc5b04ca05080115195d15c456@mail.gmail.com>
	<20050801223708.GE17649@tobias.lan>

Are you referring to the statistics gathering target for ANALYZE? Based on 
your email, I just tried the following and then re-ran the explain analyze 
but got the same "incorrect" plan:

alter table candidates617004
alter column sourceId set statistics 1000,
alter column targetId set statistics 1000;
analyze candidates617004;

alter table lte_user
alter column user_id set statistics 1000;
analyze lte_user;

Thanks for your suggestion,
Meetesh

On 8/2/05, Tobias Brox <tobias@nordicbet.com> wrote:
> 
> [Meetesh Karia - Tue at 12:19:27AM +0200]
> > We're using 8.0.3 and we're seeing a problem where the planner is 
> choosing a
> > seq scan and hash join over an index scan. If I set enable_hashjoin to 
> off,
> > then I get the plan I'm expecting and the query runs a lot faster. I've 
> also
> > tried lowering the random page cost (even to 1) but the planner still
> > chooses to use the hash join.
> 
> Have you tried increasing the statistics collection?
> 
> --
> Tobias Brox, +47-91700050
> Nordicbet, IT dept
>

view thread (8+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <fc5b04ca0508011630e745176@mail.gmail.com>
Permalink:  ../fc5b04ca0508011630e745176@mail.gmail.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/fc5b04ca0508011630e745176@mail.gmail.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: meetesh.karia@gmail.com, tobias@nordicbet.com
  Subject: Re: Planner incorrectly choosing seq scan over index scan
  In-Reply-To: <fc5b04ca0508011630e745176@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox