From: Steve Woodcock <steve.woodcock@gmail.com>
To: Scott Sipe <cscotts@mindspring.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Super-smack?
Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 14:06:44 +0100
Message-ID: <ff68c4ad0605010606k1f8147d8ue6b650b05958d562@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <92F10BE1-B193-4EEA-877A-9260B55C2844@mindspring.com>
References: <92F10BE1-B193-4EEA-877A-9260B55C2844@mindspring.com>
On 01/05/06, Scott Sipe <cscotts@mindspring.com> wrote:
> So, my question is, before I do any further digging, is super-smack
> flawed?
Hmm, selects and updates of a 90k row table using the primary key, but
no sign of a VACUUM ANALYZE...
Cheers, Steve Woodcock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: steve.woodcock@gmail.com, cscotts@mindspring.com
Subject: Re: Super-smack?
In-Reply-To: <ff68c4ad0605010606k1f8147d8ue6b650b05958d562@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox