pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Dennis Muhlestein <djmuhlestein@gmail.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Possible Redundancy/Performance Solution
Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 09:36:55 -0600
Message-ID: <fvsian$2b8o$1@news.hub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0805062030020.11322@westnet.com>
References: <fvq189$2ej4$1@news.hub.org>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0805061316340.3589@westnet.com>
	<fvq854$ocq$1@news.hub.org>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0805061625150.11474@westnet.com>
	<fvqj5j$5v5$1@news.hub.org>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0805062030020.11322@westnet.com>


> 
> 1) RAID1+0 to make one big volume
> 2) RAID1 for OS/apps/etc, RAID1 for database
> 3) RAID1 for OS+xlog, RAID1 for database
> 4) RAID1 for OS+popular tables, RAID1 for rest of database

Lots of good info, thanks for all the replies.  It seems to me then, 
that the speed increase you'd get from raid0 is not worth the downtime 
risk, even when you have multiple servers.  I'll start pricing things 
out and see what options we have.

Thanks again,
Dennis

view thread (8+ messages)

Message-ID: <fvsian$2b8o$1@news.hub.org>
Permalink:  ../fvsian$2b8o$1@news.hub.org/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/fvsian$2b8o$1@news.hub.org

copy link · copy postgr.es

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: djmuhlestein@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: Possible Redundancy/Performance Solution
  In-Reply-To: <fvsian$2b8o$1@news.hub.org>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox