pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: raghavendra t <raagavendra.rao@gmail.com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: How to fast the REINDEX
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 03:03:48 +0530
Message-ID: <j2tbc7de5a31003311433h5c4ce21ej79aa67067e98a4bf@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BB3722F02000025000302BF@gw.wicourts.gov>
References: <p2ubc7de5a31003311351p83987eedpbb86727ab9fa9ca3@mail.gmail.com>
	<4BB3722F02000025000302BF@gw.wicourts.gov>

Hi Kevin,

Thank you for the update,

>>What does the table look like?  What indexes are there?
Table has a combination of byteas. Indexes are b-tree and Partial

>>Why are you doing that?
Our table face lot of updates and deletes in a day, so we prefer reindex to
update the indexes as well overcome with a corrupted index.

>> How long?
More than 4 hrs..

>>What run time are you expecting?
Less than what it is taking at present.

>>It's hard to answer that without more information, like PostgreSQL
>>version and configuration, for starters.  See:
                                                  version
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 PostgreSQL 8.4.2 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC) 4.1.2
20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-44), 32-bit
(1 row)

>>http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/SlowQueryQuestions
Expected the performance question..

Regards
Raghavendra

On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>wrote:

> raghavendra t <raagavendra.rao@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I have a table with 40GB size, it has few indexes on it.
>
> What does the table look like?  What indexes are there?
>
> > When i try to REINDEX on the table,
>
> Why are you doing that?
>
> > its take a long time.
>
> How long?
>
> > I tried increasing the maintenance_work_mem, but still i havnt
> > find a satisfying result.
>
> What run time are you expecting?
>
> > Questions
> > =======
> > 1. What are the parameters will effect, when issuing the REINDEX
> >    command
> > 2. Best possible way to increase the spead of the REINDEX
>
> It's hard to answer that without more information, like PostgreSQL
> version and configuration, for starters.  See:
>
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/SlowQueryQuestions
>
> My best guess is that you can make them instantaneous by not running
> them.  A good VACUUM policy should make such runs unnecessary in
> most cases -- at least on recent PostgreSQL versions.
>
> -Kevin
>

view thread (19+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <j2tbc7de5a31003311433h5c4ce21ej79aa67067e98a4bf@mail.gmail.com>
Permalink:  ../j2tbc7de5a31003311433h5c4ce21ej79aa67067e98a4bf@mail.gmail.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/j2tbc7de5a31003311433h5c4ce21ej79aa67067e98a4bf@mail.gmail.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: raagavendra.rao@gmail.com, Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov
  Subject: Re: How to fast the REINDEX
  In-Reply-To: <j2tbc7de5a31003311433h5c4ce21ej79aa67067e98a4bf@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox