From: PFC <lists@peufeu.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Javier Somoza <jsomoza@pandasoftware.es>
Cc: Evgeny Gridasov <eugrid@fpm.kubsu.ru>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: wal sync method
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:31:33 +0100
Message-ID: <op.s5piavelcigqcu@apollo13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200602280114.k1S1EAQ17159@candle.pha.pa.us>
References: <200602280114.k1S1EAQ17159@candle.pha.pa.us>
Just a stupid question about the various fsync settings.
There is fsync=off, but is there fsync=fflush ?
fflush would mean only an OS crash could cause data loss,
I think.it could be useful for some applications where you need a speed
boost (like testing database import scripts...) without being as scary as
fsync=off...
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: lists@peufeu.com, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, jsomoza@pandasoftware.es, eugrid@fpm.kubsu.ru
Subject: Re: wal sync method
In-Reply-To: <op.s5piavelcigqcu@apollo13>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox