From: PFC <lists@boutiquenumerique.com>
To: blblack@gmail.com
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Performance considerations for very heavy INSERT traffic
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:24:24 +0200
Message-ID: <op.sw0dqyiwth1vuj@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84621a6050912140464c380c3@mail.gmail.com>
References: <84621a6050912140464c380c3@mail.gmail.com>
> I know I haven't provided a whole lot of application-level detail here,
You did !
What about :
- using COPY instead of INSERT ?
(should be easy to do from the aggregators)
- using Bizgres ?
(which was designed for your use case)
- splitting the xlog and the data on distinct physical drives or arrays
- benchmarking something else than ext3
(xfs ? reiser3 ?)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: lists@boutiquenumerique.com, blblack@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Performance considerations for very heavy INSERT traffic
In-Reply-To: <op.sw0dqyiwth1vuj@localhost>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox