From: PFC <lists@boutiquenumerique.com>
To: Joe <svn@freedomcircle.net>
To: Magnus Hagander <mha@sollentuna.net>
Cc: Gavin Sherry <swm@alcove.com.au>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Comparative performance
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 18:12:52 +0200
Message-ID: <op.sxvgnqfrth1vuj@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <433BDB0B.8010002@freedomcircle.net>
References: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE92E6D6@algol.sollentuna.se>
<433BDB0B.8010002@freedomcircle.net>
> I just tried using pg_pconnect() and I didn't notice any significant
> improvement. What bothers me most is that with Postgres I tend to see
> jerky behavior on almost every page: the upper 1/2 or 2/3 of the page
> is displayed first and you can see a blank bottom (or you can see a
> half-filled completion bar). With MySQL each page is generally
> displayed in one swoop.
Persistent connections are useful when your page is fast and the
connection time is an important part of your page time. It is mandatory if
you want to serve more than 20-50 hits/s without causing unnecessary load
on the database. This is not your case, which is why you don't notice any
improvement...
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: lists@boutiquenumerique.com, svn@freedomcircle.net, mha@sollentuna.net, swm@alcove.com.au
Subject: Re: Comparative performance
In-Reply-To: <op.sxvgnqfrth1vuj@localhost>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox