From: PFC <lists@boutiquenumerique.com>
To: Luke Lonergan <llonergan@greenplum.com>
To: Ron Peacetree <rjpeace@earthlink.net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 23:45:10 +0200
Message-ID: <op.sxxqpkrcth1vuj@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BF62F06E.10617%llonergan@greenplum.com>
References: <BF62F06E.10617%llonergan@greenplum.com>
> Bulk loading speed is irrelevant here - that is dominated by parsing,
> which
> we have covered copiously (har har) previously and have sped up by 500%,
> which still makes Postgres < 1/2 the loading speed of MySQL.
Let's ask MySQL 4.0
> LOAD DATA INFILE blah
0 errors, 666 warnings
> SHOW WARNINGS;
not implemented. upgrade to 4.1
duhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: lists@boutiquenumerique.com, llonergan@greenplum.com, rjpeace@earthlink.net, josh@agliodbs.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?
In-Reply-To: <op.sxxqpkrcth1vuj@localhost>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox