From: PFC <lists@peufeu.com>
To: Luke Lonergan <LLonergan@greenplum.com>
To: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 17:40:50 +0200
Message-ID: <op.ts5cicyjcigqcu@apollo13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C3E62232E3BCF24CBA20D72BFDCB6BF804382037@MI8NYCMAIL08.Mi8.com>
References: <C3E62232E3BCF24CBA20D72BFDCB6BF804382037@MI8NYCMAIL08.Mi8.com>
Oh by the way, I saw a nifty patch in the queue :
Find a way to reduce rotational delay when repeatedly writing last WAL page
Currently fsync of WAL requires the disk platter to perform a full
rotation to fsync again.
One idea is to write the WAL to different offsets that might reduce the
rotational delay.
This will not work if the WAL is on RAID1, because two disks never spin
exactly at the same speed...
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: lists@peufeu.com, LLonergan@greenplum.com, mstone+postgres@mathom.us
Subject: Re: setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives
In-Reply-To: <op.ts5cicyjcigqcu@apollo13>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox